BREAKING: The White House is looking to EXCLUDE illegal aliens from the US census per Miller! This would take away SEVERAL House seats from California!

In a significant development that has stunned both political circles and the general public, the White House is reportedly exploring a plan to exclude illegal immigrants from the official count in the U.S. Census. The announcement was made public by former Trump advisor Stephen Miller, who revealed that the Trump administration, now under new leadership, is considering the exclusion of undocumented aliens from the census count, which traditionally includes all persons residing in the United States, regardless of their immigration status.
This move is set to have major implications for the apportionment of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, particularly for states like California, which have large populations of undocumented immigrants. According to Miller, the exclusion of illegal aliens from the census could lead to a significant redistribution of House seats, with California poised to lose several of its current seats in the House. This would mark a monumental shift in the political landscape of the country, particularly in California, where immigration is a central issue and the population of undocumented immigrants is among the highest in the nation.
The implications of this potential decision are far-reaching. For decades, the census has counted every person living in the United States, regardless of their legal status. The inclusion of undocumented immigrants has played a role in the allocation of federal resources and congressional representation. If the White House’s plan goes into effect, the exclusion of illegal aliens could lead to the reallocation of federal funds and a reduction in the political power of states with large immigrant populations.
California, in particular, could see significant consequences. With an estimated 2 million undocumented immigrants living in the state, the exclusion from the census count would likely result in a loss of political representation in Washington, D.C. As one of the most populous states, California’s representation in the House is based in part on its population size, which includes a large number of undocumented individuals. Losing several House seats would be a blow to the state’s political influence, particularly for the Democratic Party, which has long been a strong advocate for immigrant rights and protections.
The plan to exclude illegal aliens from the census is likely to spark a heated debate across the political spectrum. Proponents argue that it is unfair for non-citizens, particularly those in the country illegally, to be included in the census count when it comes to determining political representation. They contend that the census should only count legal residents, as undocumented individuals are not entitled to the same political rights and representation as U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. Critics, however, argue that this move is a politically motivated attempt to diminish the political power of states with large immigrant populations, especially those that lean Democratic.
Legal experts are also weighing in on the matter, with some questioning the legality of excluding illegal aliens from the census count. The U.S. Constitution mandates that the census count “the whole number of persons in each state,” and there is no explicit exemption for undocumented immigrants. Advocates for immigrant rights argue that excluding illegal aliens would be a violation of this constitutional mandate and could face significant legal challenges. Others believe that the exclusion could lead to further polarization on immigration issues and exacerbate divisions in the country.
The timing of this move also raises questions. The census, which was last conducted in 2020, has already been used to determine congressional districts and the allocation of federal funds for the next decade. If the White House’s plan were to be implemented, it would require a significant adjustment to these numbers, leading to a reallocation of House seats and federal resources. This would likely spark a new round of legal battles and political wrangling, as states like California and New York, which have large immigrant populations, would stand to lose out on both political representation and federal funding.
As the Biden administration continues to navigate complex issues surrounding immigration, the question of how to count undocumented individuals in the census will be a key point of contention. While immigration reform remains a top priority for the administration, this proposal could shift the debate in a new direction, as it pits the desire for fair political representation against concerns about the rights of non-citizens in the country.
It is still unclear whether this plan will move forward, but the potential consequences of such a decision are already becoming evident. California, along with other states with large undocumented populations, could see a dramatic shift in political power, while the broader nation could experience a reevaluation of how it defines citizenship and representation in the 21st century. As legal challenges loom and public outcry intensifies, it remains to be seen whether the White House will continue to push forward with this controversial plan or whether it will be modified or abandoned in the face of opposition.