Trump Slams Federal Judge Over Sanctuary Cities Injunction
On April 26, 2025, President Donald Trump sharply criticized a federal judge’s decision to block his executive order aimed at defunding sanctuary cities, calling the ruling “unbelievable.” The injunction, issued by U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick in San Francisco on April 24, 2025, halted Trump’s attempt to withhold federal funds from jurisdictions like San Francisco, San Diego, and 14 other cities and counties that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Trump, speaking out on the issue, stated, “It’s unbelievable when you hear a judge in San Francisco or San Diego does nationwide injunctions … Sanctuary cities are sanctuary for criminals,” reflecting sentiments echoed across posts on X.
The lawsuit, led by San Francisco and joined by cities like Seattle, Portland, and Minneapolis, argued that Trump’s order was unconstitutional, violating separation-of-powers principles and the spending clause. Judge Orrick, who previously blocked a similar Trump order in 2017, cited irreparable harm to public safety programs, including initiatives combating crime and supporting rape victims, if funds were withheld. San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu called the ruling a stand against “illegal and authoritarian” federal overreach
Trump’s order, backed by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, sought to penalize sanctuary jurisdictions for not assisting with deportation efforts, claiming such policies shield criminals. However, sanctuary cities argue their laws foster trust with immigrant communities, encouraging crime reporting without fear of deportation. The White House labeled Orrick’s decision an “egregious overreach,” expressing confidence in overturning it at the Supreme Court.
This legal battle, echoing disputes from Trump’s first term, underscores ongoing tensions over immigration policy and federal authority. As the case progresses, the nation watches to see if Trump’s push to defund sanctuary cities will prevail or face further judicial roadblocks.
