DOJ Launches Grand Jury Investigation into ‘Russiagate’ — Gabbard Claims Obama Admin Fabricated Narrative
In a move that’s sending shockwaves through Washington, the U.S. Department of Justice has launched a grand jury investigation into the origins of the infamous “Russiagate” narrative. The probe follows a criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who claims the Obama administration intentionally fabricated and promoted the story that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump win.
Speaking at a recent press briefing, Gabbard stated:
“Former President Barack Obama and his intelligence officials promoted a contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn’t.”
This bold accusation comes years after the original narrative dominated headlines and shaped the political landscape. While multiple intelligence agencies previously concluded there was evidence of Russian interference, Gabbard’s statement challenges the very foundation of those conclusions — suggesting it was all orchestrated from within to manipulate public perception and undermine Trump’s presidency from the start.
Attorney General Pam Bondi, recently appointed to lead the Department of Justice, has taken Gabbard’s referral seriously. Earlier this week, she directed her staff to begin formal proceedings, resulting in the grand jury probe that is now underway.
“This is not about relitigating the past,” Bondi said in a short statement. “It’s about accountability. If there was an abuse of power or deliberate misinformation campaign at the highest levels of government, the American people deserve to know.”
As the investigation gains momentum, many are left questioning what this could mean for key figures from the Obama era — including former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and even Obama himself. Legal experts speculate that the grand jury will seek to examine internal communications, intelligence assessments, and classified briefings from 2016 and 2017.
Zack Smith, a Senior Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, commented on the matter during a segment with LiveNOW:
“This could be one of the most consequential investigations in modern American history. If the claims are substantiated, it would reveal a weaponization of intelligence for political ends — a fundamental threat to democracy.”
Unsurprisingly, reactions have been divided along partisan lines. Supporters of Trump view the probe as long-overdue vindication, while critics warn it may be an attempt to rewrite history and discredit legitimate investigations.
Meanwhile, Tulsi Gabbard has promised that more evidence will be presented in the coming weeks. “This is just the beginning,” she told reporters. “We must shine a light on the truth — no matter how uncomfortable it may be.”
The grand jury process is expected to be lengthy, and outcomes are far from certain. But one thing is clear: the Russiagate controversy, far from being settled, may be entering its most explosive chapter yet.
