“Through the press attacks, toxic contents approached more than 200 million followers through the X platform, Musk has made harassment legal complaints, and artificial efforts to appropriate Openai. Musk has tried all the tools available to harm Openai,”, “, the tools have tried all the tools available to harm Openai”, “,” said Musk. “CNNConduct the content of the lawsuit sent to the Northern California district court at the end of April 9.

In the application, Openai asked the judge to prevent Musk “carry out any attack” on the future. Họ cũng nhấn mạnh tỷ phú Mỹ “phải chịu trách nhiệm về những thiệt hại đã gây ra.

The trial will be made in the next spring, not yet determined.Marc Toberoff, Musk’s lawyer, did not comment directly on the lawsuit. However, he recalled the offer to buy Openai earlier this year for $ 97.4 billion. “If Openai’s Board of Directors actually reviewed the purchase and obligations to do, how serious they would find it,” Toberoff saidReuters. “Openai’s assets are paid reasonably by the market, but allegedly ‘intervening’ in their business plan.”

In the post on April 10, Openai said: “Elon’s relentless actions against us are just a good will to slow Openai and gain control of the top AI initiatives to serve his personal interests.”

Musk did not comment.

Elon Musk co -founded OpenaiSam AltmanAnd some other names in 2015 before leaving in 2019. The time later, the US billionaire repeatedly criticized the company to follow the profit, going against the original non -profit target. Last year, Mr. sue Openai and Altman to allegescheatgrandfather.

Earlier this month, Musk asked the Court to issue a temporary ban, preventing Openai from transferring to a for profit. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the Oakland District Court, California, thenUncle askedof the US billionaire on the grounds of not providing enough necessary evidence.

However, Rogers said it was ready to organize a trial in the fall to consider Musk’s allegations, that Openai’s conversion plan was illegal. The judge said she wanted to resolve the lawsuit quickly because of “public benefits that are threatened and the risk of damage if an illegal transformation occurs”.