Obama’s CIA Caught Red-Handed: Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima Exposed as Puppet in Russiagate Hoax!
In a bombshell revelation that’s setting social media on fire, newly declassified documents from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have blown the lid off a scandal that could rewrite the history of the 2016 election. The files allege that Obama’s CIA used Washington Post reporter Ellen Nakashima as a mouthpiece to spread three explosive fake stories: the CrowdStrike DNC hack, the Trump-Russia collusion myth, and the Carter Page FISA warrants. Critics are now branding Nakashima’s 2018 Pulitzer Prize as a “fraud” and accusing Obama’s inner circle of orchestrating a plot to sabotage Trump’s presidency. Buckle up—this is the political scandal of the century!
The declassified documents, including a 2020 House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) report and CIA “lessons learned” analyses, paint a damning picture. They claim Obama’s allies, allegedly working with Soros-funded operatives and Hillary Clinton’s campaign, crafted a deliberate scheme to undermine Trump’s 2016 victory. The centerpiece? A fabricated Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that pushed the narrative of Russian interference to favor Trump, with Nakashima as the media’s “useful idiot” to amplify the lies.
Gabbard’s July 23, 2025, declassification of HPSCI findings sent shockwaves through Washington, accusing Obama of personally ordering the ICA’s fake narrative. The documents allege former CIA Director John Brennan, with Obama’s blessing, ignored credible intelligence and incorporated the discredited Steele dossier—described as “internet rumor”—to paint Trump as a Russian puppet. Now, the latest batch of files directly implicates Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey, with the DOJ announcing a task force led by FBI Director Kash Patel to investigate their roles in this alleged conspiracy.
Nakashima, a national security reporter for The Washington Post, is at the heart of the storm. Declassified FBI notes reveal she received “off-the-record” guidance from the CIA to shape three pivotal stories that fueled the Russiagate narrative. Her June 14, 2016, article claimed Russian hackers breached the DNC, based on CrowdStrike’s findings. But the documents show FBI officials fed her curated “guidance” to promote this narrative, despite lacking direct evidence of state involvement. The goal? To distract from Clinton’s email scandals by framing the hack as election interference.
Then, in January 2017, Nakashima’s reporting on the ICA portrayed a unified intelligence community claiming Russia aimed to help Trump win. Declassified CIA reviews, however, reveal this was a fabrication. Obama allegedly directed a tight-knit group, led by Brennan, to craft a false “consensus” over analyst objections, tossing out credible intelligence that contradicted the narrative. “They cherry-picked lies to fit the story,” one X post fumed, reflecting the outrage online.
The third strike came on April 11, 2017, when Nakashima reported on FISA warrants targeting Carter Page as a supposed Russian agent. The documents now show this stemmed from the Steele dossier’s inclusion in the ICA, pushed by Brennan despite warnings it was unverified. This enabled spying on Trump’s campaign, a move critics call “treasonous.” Social media platforms like Threads are erupting with hashtags like #RussiagateHoax and #PulitzerFraud, as users demand accountability. “Nakashima didn’t report—she regurgitated CIA scripts!” one user posted, capturing the public’s fury.
The fallout is seismic. Nakashima’s 2018 Pulitzer for national reporting on Russian election meddling is under fire, with critics like Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley calling it “tainted by lies.” The declassified files suggest Nakashima failed to verify CIA leaks, acting as a conduit for politicized intelligence. Posts on X are merciless, with one user declaring, “Her Pulitzer belongs in a shredder!” Others defend her, arguing she was a pawn in a larger game, with one Thread post stating, “Reporters rely on sources—blame the CIA, not Nakashima.”
The documents also allege a broader conspiracy involving Soros employees working with Clinton’s campaign, approved by Hillary herself, to craft the Russia narrative. Former DNI James Clapper and National Security Advisor Susan Rice are named as key players, with Gabbard claiming their actions “subverted the will of the American people.” Trump himself weighed in on Truth Social, posting an AI-generated video of Obama’s arrest, captioned, “No one is above the law!” The post racked up millions of views, fueling the online frenzy.
As the DOJ’s task force digs deeper, questions swirl about accountability. Will Brennan and Comey face charges? Will Nakashima’s Pulitzer be revoked? And what does this mean for the credibility of legacy media? The Washington Post has stayed silent, declining comment on the allegations. Meanwhile, Cincinnati Mayor Aftab Pureval’s recent condemnation of unrelated mob violence in Ohio has drawn comparisons, with some X users questioning if “media mobs” like Nakashima’s reporting are just as damaging.
This scandal is far from over, and it’s tearing through social media like wildfire. Was Nakashima a knowing accomplice or an unwitting tool? Did Obama’s CIA weaponize the press to sabotage Trump? Join the conversation on Threads and weigh in on this explosive controversy that’s rewriting the Russiagate saga!
