Students at Temecula Valley Middle School Stage Walkout Over Gender Ideology Bathroom Policy

Temecula, CA – September 3, 2025 – In a bold display of conviction, dozens of students at James L. Day Middle School in Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) walked out of classes on Tuesday morning to protest a controversial bathroom policy allowing biological males to use girls’ restrooms and locker rooms based on gender identity. The demonstration, which began at 7:45 a.m., saw approximately 80 to 90 students, joined by 15 to 20 parents and community members, rallying outside the school to demand privacy and safety for female students. The walkout, reported by local outlet Valley News, has sparked widespread discussion and garnered significant support on social media, with many praising the young students for their courage.

A Stand for Privacy and Safety

The protest was triggered by TVUSD’s policy, aligned with California Education Code § 221.5(f), which permits students to access bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity, regardless of their biological sex. This policy has been a flashpoint in Temecula, particularly after a proposed measure, Board Policy 5145.31, would have required female students uncomfortable with sharing facilities with biological males to file a “Mental Health Accommodation Request” or claim a religious exemption to access private facilities. The policy, which critics argue pathologizes a natural desire for privacy, was tabled in a 4-1 vote on August 26, 2025, but not before igniting outrage among parents and students.

Students, primarily seventh and eighth graders, marched along the sidewalk outside James L. Day Middle School, many wearing white bows and pink “Save Girls’ Sports” bracelets. Handmade signs emphasized their call for single-sex privacy, with messages like “Our girls deserve safety, respect, and dignity” and “Privacy is a right, not a diagnosis.” A small counter-protest across the street featured pro-transgender slogans chalked on the sidewalk, but a police presence ensured the event remained peaceful. Sophia Lorey, Outreach Director for the California Family Council, was on-site to support the families and document the demonstration.

Community and Parental Backlash

Parents and community members expressed frustration with the district’s approach, arguing that it unfairly burdens female students. Elizabeth Craig, a parent at the protest, told The Press-Enterprise, “It is just a matter of privacy and keeping boys and girls separated. Gender identity or not, we all have different parts and are made differently.” Another parent, quoted by Valley News, stated, “My daughter’s not anxious or sick, she just deserves a girls’ locker room.” Critics of the policy, including Sonja Shaw, president of the Chino Valley Unified School District board, condemned the requirement for mental health or religious exemptions, calling it “against common sense” and asserting that girls shouldn’t need a special form to ensure privacy.

The proposed policy, supported by TVUSD board members Dr. Melinda Anderson, Emil Barham, and Steven Schwartz, was criticized for stigmatizing girls’ privacy concerns. Board member Joseph Komrosky, who voted against tabling the policy, argued it was like “putting lipstick on a pig” and pushed for a complete rejection, emphasizing a return to “back-to-basics education” free from gender ideology debates. Dr. Komrosky, speaking as a concerned parent, told the California Family Council, “What’s happening at this middle school, when a biological boy enters the girls’ locker room, is anything but traditional. It’s social and political activism.”

A Broader National Debate

The Temecula walkout reflects a growing national conversation about transgender bathroom policies in schools. Similar protests have occurred across the U.S., including at Elida High School in Ohio and Perkiomen Valley School District in Pennsylvania, where students and parents have challenged policies allowing biological males in female facilities. In 2025, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Florida school policy requiring bathroom use based on biological sex, citing privacy and safety under Title IX. However, conflicting rulings in other circuits have set the stage for a potential U.S. Supreme Court showdown.

In Temecula, the policy’s alignment with California law has complicated efforts to address parental concerns. A district statement acknowledged the right to peaceful protest but noted that state law mandates access to facilities based on gender identity. The board is now exploring “a broader range of opt-out options” for students uncomfortable sharing facilities, with a revised proposal slated for discussion on September 9, 2025. Board member Emil Barham, who suggested tabling the original policy, emphasized avoiding stigmatization through mental health labels, signaling a potential shift in approach.

Social Media and Public Support

The walkout gained traction online, with posts on X praising the students’ bravery. One widely shared post by @libsoftiktok declared, “Brave students at a Temecula Valley middle school (@TVUSD) in CA stage a walkout to PROTEST the district’s woke policies that allow MALES to invade the FEMALE restrooms. THESE KIDS ARE INCREDIBLE 👏.” Supporters lauded the students for standing up at a young age, with comments highlighting their “strength” and “commitment to fairness.” However, these posts remain inconclusive without official district confirmation of all claims.

Critics of the policy, including attorney Erin Friday of Our Duty, argue that labeling privacy concerns as a mental health issue misuses federal disability laws like Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. “Nothing in the DSM-5 treats a desire for single-sex privacy as a disorder,” Friday told the California Family Council, calling the policy coercive and misguided. Meanwhile, advocates for transgender rights, including groups like Gender Inclusive Schools, argue that inclusive policies protect vulnerable students and that private stalls are available for those seeking alternatives.

Looking Forward

As the Temecula Valley Unified School District prepares for its September 9 meeting, the community remains divided. Parents and students hope for a policy that prioritizes privacy without stigmatizing anyone, while the district navigates California’s legal mandates. The walkout has amplified the voices of young students, proving that even middle schoolers can spark change. Whether the board adopts a new privacy policy or maintains the status quo, the debate underscores a broader societal challenge: balancing inclusion with the right to personal boundaries.

For now, the students of James L. Day Middle School have made their stance clear, and their actions have resonated far beyond Temecula. As one protester’s sign read, “Having boundaries is a healthy and necessary part of growing up—they should be celebrated, not shamed.” The outcome of this controversy may set a precedent for how schools nationwide address the complex intersection of gender, privacy, and student rights.

Word count: 800