The French football scene is boiling following the recent words of Lilian Thuram, legend of the Blues and world champion 1998. In a shock statement, Thuram publicly asked Didier Deschamps, coach of the French team, to remove the captain’s armband from Kylian Mbappé. According to him, the young striker of Paris Saint-Germain, 26 years old, lacks maturity and seriousness to assume such a crucial role. This position, coming from such a respected figure, aroused a keen debate among supporters and observers.
Thuram, known for his outspokenness, did not chew his words. He believes that the capitalist demands an exemplarity and a severity that Mbappé, despite his exceptional talent, would not yet have fully. For the former defender, the leadership of a national team is not limited to performance on the ground, but implies an ability to unite and inspire a pressure group. Mbappé, often under the spotlight for his exploits and his charisma, is also criticized for certain attitudes perceived as arrogant or casual, which feeds the thuram argument.
To replace Mbappé, Thuram proposed a name that surprised many people: Antoine Griezmann. The 34 -year -old Atlético of Madrid Atlético of Madrid is considered by Thuram as a natural leader, capable of federating the team by his experience and his commitment. Griezmann, often rented for his tactical intelligence and his dedication, has already worn the armband several times in the absence of Mbappé. His profile, more discreet but constant, contrasts with the flamboyance of the young PSG star, which seems to correspond to Thuram’s vision for the role.
This outing comes at a key moment for the Blues, while they are preparing for important deadlines, including the 2025 Nations League. Deschamps, known for its loyalty to its key players, has not yet officially reacted. However, withdrawing the brassard in Mbappé, considered the face of French football, would be a daring and risky decision. Such a measure could divide the locker room and the supporters, already shared on the issue.
Social networks amplify controversy, with pro- and anti-mity hashtags in trend. The attacker’s defenders recall his central role in the 2018 world coronation and his decisive performances, while others support Thuram, believing that a captain must embody impeccable values. This debate reveals the tensions between the new generation and the traditional expectations of French football.
Whatever happens, this controversy highlights the challenges that Deschamps faces to maintain harmony within his team. The choice of captain, much more than a symbol, could influence the dynamics of the Blues in the coming months. The eyes are now turned to the next match, where every Mbappé gesture will be scrutinized.
