Kid Rock has made headlines once again, this time targeting Oprah Winfrey in a scathing criticism for what he describes as her betrayal of Dr. Mehmet Oz. The rock musician accused Oprah of hypocrisy, calling her a “fraud” for allegedly distancing herself from Dr. Oz during his controversial political campaign.
Dr. Oz, a television personality and heart surgeon, rose to fame through Oprah’s endorsement and frequent appearances on The Oprah Winfrey Show. However, during his recent run for the U.S. Senate, Oprah publicly supported his opponent, a move that many interpreted as a shift in her stance toward the former TV doctor.
Kid Rock didn’t mince words in expressing his disappointment. “Oprah built Dr. Oz up, made him a household name, and now she’s turning her back on him? That’s fraud in my book,” he said in a recent interview. He went on to criticize Oprah for what he sees as her selective support, accusing her of abandoning people she once championed for political convenience.
Supporters of Oprah argue that her decision was based on principles, not personal loyalties. They point out that endorsing Dr. Oz’s opponent aligns with her long-standing values and her commitment to supporting candidates she believes in. Oprah herself addressed the matter, stating that her endorsement was “a decision made with the future in mind.”
The feud has sparked a broader discussion about loyalty, celebrity endorsements, and the intersection of politics and fame. While some fans back Kid Rock’s callout, others feel it’s an unnecessary attack on a media mogul known for her philanthropy and influence.
As the controversy continues to simmer, one thing is clear: Oprah’s actions—and Kid Rock’s fiery response—have reignited debates about the responsibilities of public figures in navigating personal and political alliances.
