Just when it appeared as though every federal court in the land was aligned against President Donald Trump, he just got the victory he has needed and it came from the most unlikely source: The U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. This ruling from the so-called ‘second Supreme Court’ is going to reverberate across the country in every case left-wing groups have filed against the Trump administration.
The White House secured a major legal victory with broad implications on Saturday, as the appeals court issued a ruling granting a stay on a lower court’s order that required the reinstatement of more than 1,000 Voice of America (VOA) employees who had been dismissed as part of the administration’s efforts to restructure the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM). The earlier ruling had mandated not only the reinstatement of the employees but also a full return to VOA’s prior operational standards.
“This is a huge victory for President Trump and his Article II powers granted in the United States Constitution. It’s also a victory for US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and VOA,” Kari Lake, who has been serving as a senior advisor to the USAGM for the Trump Administration, told Fox News after Saturday’s ruling was handed down. The decision enables the administration to proceed with its planned cuts and restructuring of the USAGM and its subsidiaries, including the VOA and Radio Free Europe.
“We are eager to accomplish President Trump’s America First agenda which has always been to modernize and make our government efficient while cutting waste, fraud, and abuse,” Lake said. “Now that we have a favorable ruling in the appeals court, we look forward to accomplishing the plan we’ve always had; to bring VOA into the 21st century.”
The court’s 2–1 decision could significantly impact the numerous legal challenges brought by lower federal courts against the president’s authority. The majority emphasized the importance of judicial deference to executive power in matters related to federal employment and contractual decisions. The ruling noted that the lower court likely lacked jurisdiction to intervene in the Executive Branch’s personnel and funding actions—especially in cases involving grant agreements with non-federal entities like Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.
The VOA case highlights a central conflict between the Trump administration and activist judges, many of whom have issued rulings that challenge or contradict presidential authority. Saturday’s appellate decision sets the stage for a potential landmark ruling from the Supreme Court on whether lower courts can impose constraints on the executive branch’s control over personnel and funding decisions.
“Majority rules lower court had no jurisdiction, which means grantees must go to different court to litigate a contract dispute and employees must use the administrative personnel dispute process to fight about being fired,” Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton posted on X after the ruling was handed down. “If upheld, this push back on judicial activism could largely destroy the Left’s judicial coup against Trump’s effort to restore political control of the administrative state.”
If you want a clearer understanding of the implications of this ruling, check out this X thread.
