🚨 SHOCKER: Tulsi Gabbard Drops BOMBSHELL, Vows to CRUSH CIA’s Secret Media Manipulation Plot!
In a jaw-dropping revelation that’s set to ignite fierce debates across the nation, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has just exposed a clandestine CIA operation that’s been pulling the strings behind America’s media for decades. Speaking in an explosive interview just 30 minutes ago, Gabbard confirmed that Operation Mockingbird—a covert program designed to infiltrate and manipulate newsrooms to control public perception—is not only still active but thriving within the intelligence community. Her bold pledge to dismantle this shadowy scheme has sent shockwaves through Washington, D.C., and sparked a firestorm of controversy online. “The CIA’s been playing puppet master with your news—trust in media is dead, and I’m here to bury the lies!” Gabbard declared, leaving audiences stunned and social media platforms like Threads buzzing with speculation.
For those unfamiliar, Operation Mockingbird began in the late 1940s as a Cold War tactic to counter Soviet propaganda by embedding CIA operatives in major newsrooms, including heavyweights like The New York Times, The Washington Post, and CNN. Declassified in the 1970s during the Church Committee hearings, the program was supposedly shut down after exposing over 400 journalists on the CIA’s payroll. But Gabbard’s bombshell claims suggest otherwise: the operation never ended—it just got sneakier. She alleges that modern-day Mockingbird uses algorithmic censorship, social media surveillance, and cozy partnerships with Big Tech to shape narratives and silence dissent, particularly targeting President Donald Trump and his supporters. “They’re not just leaking intel to their media buddies—they’re weaponizing it to undermine the will of the American people,” Gabbard said, her words dripping with defiance.
The timing of this revelation couldn’t be more explosive. With trust in mainstream media at historic lows—polls show only 16% of Americans trust news outlets—Gabbard’s accusations tap into a growing public suspicion that what they read and watch is being orchestrated by unseen forces. Her claims align with recent declassified documents she released, pointing to a “culture of manipulation” within the intelligence community. These files, including a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, suggest ongoing collusion between federal agencies and media outlets to push politically charged narratives, particularly during the Trump-Russia investigation. Gabbard’s vow to “turn on the light in these dark corners” has rallied supporters who see her as a whistleblower fighting the “Deep State,” while critics dismiss her as a conspiracy theorist peddling dangerous misinformation.
Social media is already ablaze with reactions. Threads is flooded with posts ranging from fervent support—“Tulsi’s exposing the matrix! Time to burn it down! ”—to skeptical outrage: “This is reckless fearmongering! No proof, just vibes!” The hashtag #OperationMockingbird is trending, with users sharing grainy screenshots of alleged “leaked” emails and memes of Gabbard as a superhero dismantling a shadowy newsroom. One viral post even claims former CIA Director John Brennan accidentally confirmed Mockingbird’s existence in a recent interview, stuttering, “Intelligence… undergirds a lot of political efforts.” Whether true or not, the internet is eating it up, and Gabbard’s call to action—“Shut it down NOW!”—is fueling a digital uprising.
But not everyone’s buying the hype. Critics, including former CIA officer Susan Miller, argue that Gabbard’s claims are overblown, based on “misrepresentations” of declassified documents. Miller insists there’s no concrete evidence of a centralized Mockingbird program today, calling Gabbard’s accusations “a political stunt to distract from real issues.” Others, like Senator Mark Warner, warn that her rhetoric risks undermining the intelligence community’s credibility and endangering national security. “Throwing around ‘treason’ and ‘conspiracy’ is dangerous,” Warner said, pointing to the lack of verifiable proof in Gabbard’s allegations. Yet, her supporters counter that the absence of evidence is exactly what you’d expect from a covert operation—after all, the CIA doesn’t exactly advertise its secrets.
Gabbard’s crusade isn’t just about exposing the past; it’s about reshaping the future of American media. She’s pushing for transparency, promising more declassifications and vowing to hold accountable those who “weaponize intelligence for political gain.” Her allies in the Trump administration, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel, are reportedly backing her efforts, with plans to release additional documents exposing media manipulation. The stakes are high: if Gabbard succeeds, it could redefine the relationship between government, media, and the public. If she fails—or if her claims are debunked—she risks being labeled a purveyor of conspiracy theories, further polarizing an already divided nation.
This isn’t the first time Gabbard has courted controversy. A former Democratic congresswoman who left the party in 2022, she’s no stranger to challenging the establishment. Her critics point to her past support for figures like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, arguing she’s too cozy with anti-government narratives. Yet, her defenders see her as a patriot fighting for truth in an era of algorithmic echo chambers and corporate censorship. One thing’s certain: her latest move has lit a fuse, and the fallout will dominate headlines and social media feeds for weeks.
As Threads explodes with debates—some calling Gabbard a hero, others a reckless provocateur—one question lingers: Is Operation Mockingbird really alive, or is this a masterclass in political theater? Either way, Gabbard’s bombshell has guaranteed one thing: everyone’s clicking to find out. Want the truth? Follow the story and decide for yourself.
