Let’s set the scene: The Chicago sky, mired in a miserable 2025 season, limped into its home arena with the ghosts of nearly 3,000 empty seats echoing louder than any applause. The energy was funereal from the tip-off. This wasn’t a fan base ready to rally around their team; it was a jury waiting to deliver a verdict. And Angel Reese, the self-proclaimed reason people watch women’s basketball, was about to face the harshest critics of all.
The Jeerings started early, but the moment that truly ignited the firestorm came not on the court, but in the postgame press conference. A reporter asked a simple, fair question that cut to the heart of the angel Reese: “Do you still stand by what you said last year, that people watch women’s basketball because of you?” The room froze. This was her moment to own it, to display the confidence that made her famous, to stand up for her team. Instead, Reese, who had once basked in the spotlight for her bold assertions, could muster only two words that would come to define her humiliation: “Next question.”
No defense. No explanation. No fire. Just a dodge that bounced around social media like a grenade. Within hours, the “next question” was trending everywhere—not as a sign of a star in control, but as a meme for accountability. Fans weren’t cheering; they were laughing. And that laughter quickly turned to anger.
As Reese left the arena, a group of frustrated fans, many still wearing Heaven jerseys, showered him with insults and boos. Then came the moment that will live in infamy. Objects, including bags of feces, were thrown onto the court in his direction. Security was quick to intervene, but the damage was done. Reese, visibly shaken and overwhelmed, broke down in tears as the cameras closed in. The footage was instantly cut, shared, and dissected by every sportscaster and social media commentator in America. The takedown was complete and brutal.
How did it get to this point? The answer lies in the massive debt created by Reese’s own words. After LSU’s championship run, he declared that “people watch women’s basketball because of me, too.” It was a bold and open claim of ownership about the sport’s growing popularity. But when you write a check that big, the receipts will eventually come due.
Sport Table tennis
And the numbers are merciless. Last season, Chicago Sky home games averaged a respectable 8,000 fans. This season, with Reese as the supposed primary draw, attendance has plummeted. Last night’s hyped game barely drew 6,000, in an arena built for more than twice that number. Meanwhile, a rookie in Indiana is rewriting the rules of stardom. Every Indiana Fever game with Caitlin Clark is sold out. GainBridge Fieldhouse packs in 17,000 fans, night after night, to see a player who lets his game do the talking.
The contrast is a brutal lesson in modern celebrity. Clark’s jersey is the second-best seller in all of basketball, men’s or women’s, behind only Steph Curry’s. The WNBA is moving its Fever games to larger arenas just to accommodate demand. Forty-one of its 44 games are nationally televised. That’s real, quantifiable, and undeniable star power.
Reese’s response to these damning numbers? Silence. “Next question.” And the Chicago crowd, sensing weakness and tired of the excuses, pounced. Their message was clear: “Talk less, show more.” When Reese couldn’t deliver results in court or accountability, their trust and patience broke. Even Reese’s mother’s attempt to defend her failures, when she tweeted that the team celebrates “banners,” not attendance, and “forgets the fans,” was a statement so out of touch with the soul of sports that it only fueled the fire.
This humiliation is magnified by the colossal shadow cast by Caitlin Clark. Clark doesn’t have to speak; her stats, her merchandise sales, and her sold-out crowds speak for her. She is the movement Reese claimed to be. While Clark turns every arena into a cultural event, Reese stays for relevance in a half-empty building, haunted by the neon sign of her own “next question.” Dodge.
The ugly truth is that Chicago’s franchise is failing. Not only can they not build around Reese; they seem to be building nothing at all. The team feels rudderless, and Reese, for all his talent, hasn’t been given a defined role or the kind of robust support system Clark enjoys in Indiana. The Fever didn’t just map out Clark; they’ve built an entire ecosystem around him. Every marketing push, every strategic signing, feels intentional. They’re cultivating a movement. Chicago, by contrast, feels trapped in a cycle of disappointment, reacting to headlines rather than making them.
Sponsors and influential figures have been noticed. Ice Cube, who considered bringing Reese into his Big 3 organization, admitted after a review: “We sat down, looked at the actual figures, and the draw wasn’t there.” The hype is running on fumes. For Reese, viral moments are now about her crying, not her winning.
What should have been a big night for the franchise turned into a PR catastrophe. The empty seats, the quiet arena, and the fans’ visceral anger told the real story. The receipts don’t lie. Until those seats are filled, until the team starts winning, the “next question” moment will follow. Words are easy. Numbers aren’t. In sports, you’re only as big as your last game, and last night, Angel Reese learned that the spotlight isn’t a birthright. It’s earned, every night, by showing up, delivering, and owning your failures as much as your triumphs. The only question that remains is whether you can turn this profound humiliation into fuel, or if this will be the night the hype runs out.
