A recent poll has set social media ablaze, asking a question that’s dividing the nation: Do you support Pete Hegseth having total control to eliminate woke ideologies from the U.S. military? The query, dripping with controversy, has sparked heated debates across platforms like Threads, where opinions clash like thunderbolts. With President-elect Donald Trump’s polarizing pick for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, at the center of this storm, the conversation is anything but tame. Buckle up—this is the culture war’s latest battlefield, and it’s about to get wild.

Hegseth, a former Fox News host and Army National Guard veteran, has made no secret of his disdain for what he calls “woke” policies in the military. In his book The War on Warriors, he rails against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, claiming they’ve weakened America’s fighting force. “The dumbest phrase on planet Earth in the military is ‘our diversity is our strength,’” Hegseth declared on The Shawn Ryan Show podcast, arguing that such policies distract from the military’s core mission: warfighting. His fiery rhetoric has resonated with conservatives who see him as a patriot ready to restore “lethality” and “meritocracy” to the Pentagon. But for others, his crusade is a dangerous step toward division and exclusion.

The poll in question, circulating like wildfire on social media, asks whether Hegseth should be given unchecked power to dismantle these so-called woke ideologies. Supporters argue it’s high time the military refocused on combat readiness, free from what they view as divisive social experiments. “Woke-ism is destroying our military. Pete’s the guy to fix it!” one Threads user posted, echoing sentiments from figures like Representative Chip Roy, who praised Hegseth’s stance on the House floor. Others, however, see this as a reckless power grab. “Giving one man total control to ‘purge’ ideologies? That’s a recipe for chaos,” a critic countered, pointing to Hegseth’s lack of high-level leadership experience.

Hegseth’s nomination has already been a lightning rod. Confirmed by a razor-thin 51–50 Senate vote, his appointment was marred by allegations of excessive drinking, sexual assault (which he denies), and financial mismanagement. Critics, including some military leaders, worry his policies could alienate women, minorities, and LGBTQ+ service members. His vow to fire generals involved in DEI programs and his push to remove women from combat roles have fueled fears of a return to outdated practices. “Transgender people should never be allowed to serve. It’s that simple,” Hegseth stated bluntly, a comment that sent shockwaves through progressive circles. Yet, during his confirmation, he softened his tone, claiming he supports anyone who meets rigorous standards—a pivot that skeptics like Senator Tammy Duckworth, a combat veteran, dismissed as insincere.

The controversy doesn’t stop there. Hegseth’s recent moves as Defense Secretary have poured fuel on the fire. He terminated the Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) program, a bipartisan initiative signed into law by Trump himself in 2017, calling it a “woke, Biden-era” scheme. Social media erupted when it was revealed that key Trump allies, like Marco Rubio and Kristi Noem, had championed the program. “Hegseth’s out here torching Trump’s own legacy. The irony is unreal,” one Threads user quipped. Others defended him, arguing the program had been hijacked by left-wing activists. The backlash has only intensified with reports of Hegseth ordering military libraries to remove books on topics like critical race theory and gender identity, a move some call censorship and others hail as a return to focus.

This poll has tapped into a deeper cultural divide. On one side, supporters see Hegseth as a warrior against political correctness, ready to rebuild a military they believe has been softened by progressive ideals. “Our enemies don’t care about DEI. They care about winning,” a pro-Hegseth post on Threads declared, racking up thousands of likes. On the other side, opponents argue that diversity strengthens the military, citing figures like General Colin Powell, whose rise challenged the notion that DEI undermines merit. “Hegseth’s plan is a middle finger to every woman and minority who’s served with honor,” one user fumed, sparking a thread that stretched for miles.

The debate has also raised questions about Hegseth’s methods. Reports of a conservative group, the American Accountability Foundation, urging him to fire 20 “woke” senior officers—many of them women—have rattled Pentagon leaders. “This is a witch hunt, not leadership,” a defense official told AP News anonymously, warning of a chilling effect on open discourse. Meanwhile, Hegseth’s use of private Signal chats to discuss sensitive military operations has drawn scrutiny from Democrats, who’ve dubbed it “Signalgate.” These missteps have only fueled the online frenzy, with memes and hot takes flooding Threads.

So, where do you stand? Should Pete Hegseth be given free rein to reshape the military in his image, or is this a dangerous overreach that threatens unity? The poll’s results are still pouring in, but one thing’s clear: this question has ignited a firestorm that’s not dying down anytime soon. Drop your take on Threads and join the chaos—because in this culture war, silence isn’t an option.