A chilling image of alleged drug cartel members, one armed with a rifle and standing beside stacks of seized drugs, has thrust President Donald Trump’s latest proposal into the national spotlight. Shared widely on X on May 27, 2025, at 10:38 AM +07, the photo—featuring a masked figure and a blurred accomplice against a backdrop of Baja California police insignia—accompanies the provocative question: “Do you support Trump labeling drug cartels as terrorists?” The image, paired with a patriotic cartoon sticker, has ignited a fierce debate, with Trump’s call to designate Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs) gaining traction among supporters and drawing sharp criticism from opponents. As the opioid crisis claims over 80,000 lives annually in the U.S., per 2024 CDC data, this move could reshape U.S.-Mexico relations and law enforcement strategies, leaving the public divided and desperate for answers.

Trump, who returned to the White House in January 2025, has long pushed this policy, first floated during his 2024 campaign. On May 20, 2025, he reiterated his stance at a rally in Texas, vowing, “We’ll crush the cartels like the terrorists they are—stop the fentanyl flood!” The proposal would allow the U.S. to use military force, freeze cartel assets, and impose sanctions, mirroring tactics against groups like al-Qaeda. Supporters on X, like @TrumpPatriot24, cheered, “Finally, treat cartels like ISIS—save our kids from drugs!” The image’s seized drugs—likely fentanyl, a key driver of overdoses—bolsters the argument that cartels’ violence and trafficking warrant the terrorist label. A 2025 DEA report estimates cartels earn $39 billion yearly from U.S. drug sales, funding arms and corruption, which aligns with Trump’s narrative of a border security threat.
Critics, however, warn of dire consequences. Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum called the label “an act of aggression” on May 22, 2025, threatening retaliation if imposed, as reported by Reuters. Legal experts, including Georgetown’s Laura Donohue, argue it could strain diplomatic ties and escalate violence, with cartels potentially retaliating against U.S. targets. On X, @BorderJusticeNow countered, “Labeling won’t stop drugs—focus on demand, not war!” The 2023 Biden administration rejected a similar proposal, citing risks to bilateral cooperation, and some Democrats now fear Trump’s plan could disrupt joint anti-drug efforts. The image’s police backdrop also raises questions about Mexican law enforcement’s role, with some X users speculating corruption within the ranks.
The policy’s feasibility hinges on Congressional approval, which remains uncertain. The 2024 National Defense Authorization Act included provisions for FTO designations, but Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, have signaled opposition, calling it “a reckless overreach” on May 25, 2025. Proponents point to successes like the 2001 designation of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), which curbed cocaine flows, though critics note FARC’s political aims differ from cartels’ profit-driven motives. Public opinion is split: a May 2025 CNN poll shows 58% of Americans support the label, driven by fentanyl deaths, while 35% worry about international fallout.
The image itself fuels the fire. The masked figure’s rifle and the drug stacks symbolize the cartels’ lethal reach, while the blurred face hints at ongoing investigations—possibly by Baja California’s PEP (State Preventive Police). On X, @DrugWarTruth posted, “This is why we need Trump’s plan—cartels are terrorists!” Others, like @PeaceNotWarMX, urged caution, “Military action will just kill more innocents.” As Trump pushes for a vote by July 2025, the debate rages: Will labeling cartels as terrorists crush the opioid crisis or ignite a cross-border conflict? The nation watches, gripped by the stakes.