Controversy in Formula 1: Is FIA manipulating the rules to favor Red Bull in 2026?
A controversy whirlwind shakes the world of Formula 1 after the filtration of a fia regulation draft for the 2026 season. This document, analyzed in depth by the video “The FIA will fall by the engines of AM, Mercedes and Ferrari in the circuits that you want to improve” of the formula of David Perogil, reveals a proposal that could alter the competitive spirit of the sport. The FIA plans to introduce selective restrictions to the use of the power of the electric motors of certain equipment, such as Aston Martin, Mercedes and Ferrari, in specific circuits, giving unprecedented control over the energy management of the cars. This movement, according to the video, has a clear objective: to favor Red Bull, which faces serious difficulties in the development of its power unit by 2026.
The proposed regulation marks a radical change in Formula 1. For the first time, the FIA would have the ability to decide which equipment can use all its electrical power and on what clues, eliminating the autonomy that the equipment and pilots have historically had to manage their hybrid systems. This intervention is not only unprecedented, but raises serious questions about the impartiality of the governing body. According to the analysis, the justification of the FIA, which aims to avoid “extreme tactics” in energy management during classification and career sessions, lacks solidity. Instead, it seems designed to compensate for the deficiencies of Red Bull, whose engine by 2026 is not up to its competitors.
The 2026 season will be a turning point for Formula 1, with a technical change that will raise the importance of 50% of the total electrical power units, twice the current contribution. This turn towards hybrid systems has generated concern between manufacturers and FIA itself, due to the technical challenges it implies. While most teams have managed to successfully adapt to these demands, Red Bull has pressed to delay or modify the regulation, claiming problems in the performance of their engine. The response of the FIA, according to the video, is a set of rules that not only benefit Red Bull, but also favor Audi, another team with a lagged development.
One of the most controversial aspects of the draft is the progressive reduction of electrical power at higher speeds, as from 345 km/h, a limit that the FIA will adjust according to the circuit to benefit equipment with less competitive engines. This means that teams such as Mercedes, Ferrari and Aston Martin could be forced to limit their power on certain clues, which is equivalent to a direct penalty that affects their performance. This approach has been qualified as a shameless manipulation, which puts the equity and integrity of sport at risk.
In addition, the draft includes aerodynamic changes aimed at reducing progress resistance and facilitating overtaking, such as adjustments in the DRS system for more flexible use during careers. Although these modifications could improve the show, they are eclipsed by criticism of the intervention of the FIA in engines management. The video describes this approach as “shameful” and “disgusting”, arguing that bureaucracy and political interests are undermining the fundamental principles of formula 1.
The reaction in the paddock has not been waiting. Toto Wolff, head of Mercedes, has issued an ultimatum, making it clear that it will not tolerate rules that compromise the competitiveness of his team. Other teams have also expressed concern, aware that these selective restrictions could distort the results and discourage technical innovation. Formula 1, known for being a showcase of technology and talent, could lose part of its essence if these rules are implemented.
This scandal raises a disturbing question: how far is the FIA will arrive to balance the grill? While fans await answers, the debate on justice in sports intensifies. The 2026 season promises to be a turning point, not only because of technological advances, but for the decisions that will define the future of formula 1.
