Brittney Griner’s recent assertion that she should be added to ESPN’s Greatest of All Time (GOAT) list has sparked considerable discussion in the world of sports. Griner, a dominant force in women’s basketball, made her case by pointing out her key role in leading the U.S. Women’s Basketball Team to three consecutive Olympic gold medals over a span of 12 years. Her statement brings to light the ongoing debate about what it takes to be considered the greatest in a sport and how such lists should be curated.
Griner’s career achievements are indeed impressive. Since her days at Baylor University, where she led the team to an undefeated season and a national championship in 2012, Griner has been a transformative figure in women’s basketball. Standing at 6’9″ with an unmatched combination of size, skill, and athleticism, she has redefined the role of a center in the game. In the WNBA, Griner has been a perennial All-Star, a two-time scoring champion, and a WNBA champion with the Phoenix Mercury. Her contributions to the U.S. Women’s National Team, especially in the Olympics, where she helped secure three gold medals, solidify her place among the elite.
However, being added to the GOAT list is about more than just individual accolades and team successes. The GOAT debate in sports is inherently subjective, involving criteria that go beyond statistics and championships. It includes impact on the game, cultural influence, consistency over time, and the ability to elevate not just one’s team but the entire sport. Legends like Michael Jordan, Serena Williams, and in women’s basketball, players like Lisa Leslie, Diana Taurasi, and Maya Moore, have been recognized not just for their dominance on the court but for their transformative influence on their respective sports.
Griner’s case for inclusion on the GOAT list hinges on her Olympic success and her stature as one of the most dominant players in the WNBA. Winning three consecutive Olympic gold medals is no small feat, and Griner’s presence in the paint has been crucial to those victories. Her ability to perform at the highest level on the international stage is a testament to her talent and work ethic. However, when considering her inclusion on the GOAT list, it’s essential to evaluate her overall impact on the sport.
While Griner has been a dominant player, her influence on the game might not yet be on the same level as some of the other players typically mentioned in the GOAT conversation. Lisa Leslie, for instance, was a trailblazer for women’s basketball, becoming the first player to dunk in a WNBA game and playing a pivotal role in the league’s early years. Diana Taurasi, often referred to as the “White Mamba,” has been a consistent force in the WNBA and internationally, known for her scoring ability, clutch performances, and leadership. Maya Moore, whose career includes four WNBA championships, an MVP award, and a social justice impact off the court, has left an indelible mark on the sport.
Griner’s journey is still ongoing, and her influence continues to grow. She has already accomplished feats that few can match, and her candidacy for the GOAT list is not without merit. However, the GOAT list is often reserved for those whose contributions transcend their era and leave a lasting legacy on the sport as a whole.
In conclusion, Brittney Griner’s request to be added to ESPN’s GOAT list highlights the complexity of determining greatness in sports. Her achievements, particularly in leading the U.S. Women’s Basketball Team to three Olympic gold medals, are remarkable and deserving of recognition. However, inclusion on the GOAT list requires a combination of on-court success, transformative impact, and cultural influence that goes beyond individual accolades. As Griner’s career progresses, her place in the pantheon of women’s basketball will continue to be debated, but her legacy as one of the game’s greats is already well-established.
