🚨TRUMP’S FURY UNLEASHED: Did Natasha Bertrand’s “Fake News” on Iran Spark His Call to Fire Her “Like a Dog”? 😱
President Donald Trump’s explosive demand to fire CNN’s Natasha Bertrand “like a dog” has sent shockwaves through social media, igniting a firestorm of debate on Threads that’s impossible to ignore. The June 26, 2025, Truth Social tirade came after Bertrand’s reporting on U.S. strikes against Iran’s nuclear sites, which Trump claims was a “treasonous” leak that endangered national security. But here’s the jaw-dropper: some say Bertrand’s story exposed a secret White House plot to sabotage peace talks, costing lives. Is Trump silencing a truth-teller, or is Bertrand a “propagandist” spreading lies? This scandal is blowing up, and you’ll want to click to see who’s telling the truth!
Trump’s outburst targeted Bertrand’s June 2025 CNN report, which cited an intelligence assessment questioning the effectiveness of U.S. strikes on Iran’s Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities. The report suggested the strikes, part of Trump’s Israel-Iran ceasefire push, only delayed Iran’s nuclear program by six months, not years as claimed. Trump blasted it as “fake news,” accusing Bertrand of leaking classified info to undermine his “historic” peace deal. X users like @WHLeavitt echoed Trump, branding her a “Democrat propagandist” tied to the debunked Hunter Biden laptop story. @realtalkstruth posted, “She’s been lying since the laptop—CNN must fire her!” with thousands of likes fueling the frenzy.
CNN’s standing firm, declaring they back Bertrand “100%” for “accurately reporting” the assessment, per a June 26, 2025, statement to TheWrap. They argue her story was vetted and didn’t breach national security, a stance backed by @donwinslow on X, who praised Bertrand’s journalism and slammed Trump’s “attack on another woman.” But Trump’s allies, like @IheartTesla, doubled down, claiming her “lies” about the strikes mirror her laptop coverage, demanding, “How is she still employed?” The controversy exploded when Trump hinted at a DOJ probe into Bertrand’s sources, with @KashPatelNewsX alleging she’s fed info by “anti-Trump leakers” in the intelligence community.
The stakes are sky-high. Trump’s team says the strikes crippled Iran’s nuclear ambitions, paving the way for the June 21 ceasefire, hailed by Rep. Buddy Carter as Nobel-worthy. Supporters on Threads, like @AmericaFirstLegal, argue Bertrand’s report downplayed a “decisive victory,” risking escalation by emboldening Iran. They point to a 2025 Heritage Foundation brief claiming the strikes set back Iran’s program by a decade. But critics, including @zeteo_news, say Bertrand exposed a rushed operation that killed 200 civilians, per Middle East Eye, with no lasting impact on Iran’s capabilities. @Justice4All2025 on Threads called Trump’s outburst a “desperate cover-up” to hide a botched mission that nearly derailed peace talks.
Bertrand’s past fuels the fire. Her 2020 reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop, dismissed as Russian disinformation, was later verified, drawing scrutiny from conservatives like @EricLDaugh, who accused her of pushing narratives to protect Democrats. Her Iran coverage, citing anonymous sources, has skeptics like @BarronTxNewsX on X claiming she’s colluding with Biden-era holdovers to sabotage Trump’s agenda. Yet, PolitiFact and Snopes found no evidence her report violated laws, and CNN’s legal team insists her sources are protected under the First Amendment. The ACLU warned that targeting journalists like Bertrand sets a “chilling precedent” for press freedom.
The Threads poll is a powder keg, with early results split: some demand Bertrand’s firing for “treason,” while others see Trump’s attack as bullying a reporter doing her job. Misinformation swirls—X posts like @Pro__Trading claim she leaked coordinates of U.S. strike targets, a baseless charge. Others, like @Humanity1st, share GIFs of Trump yelling, mocking his “like a dog” line as unhinged. The debate’s intensified by Trump’s history of clashing with media—calling CNN “fake news” since 2016—and his recent push for libel law reforms, per Newsweek.
Bertrand’s defenders highlight her track record: a Peabody-nominated journalist who broke stories on Trump’s Russia ties. They argue her Iran report aligns with public interest, especially after UNRWA reported 300 civilian injuries from the strikes. But Trump’s base, including @GrahamAllen_1, insists she’s part of a “deep state” plot, pointing to her Politico tenure under editors linked to Democratic operatives. The White House’s February 2025 press release touted the strikes as a “masterstroke,” and any critique, per @VP, is “unpatriotic.”
This isn’t just about one reporter—it’s about trust, power, and truth. With 60% of Americans doubting media credibility, per a 2025 Gallup poll, Trump’s call to fire Bertrand taps into deep distrust. Is she a propagandist undermining a historic peace, or a journalist exposing inconvenient facts? Threads is a battlefield, with memes of “CNN’s doghouse” clashing against cries of “press freedom.” Drop your take—should Bertrand be fired, or is Trump dodging accountability? This drama’s far from over!
