The claim that “Donald Trump’s war against Harvard has failed gloriously” appears to stem from recent sentiment on X, where posts highlight Harvard’s legal actions against the Trump administration. Specifically, Harvard sued the administration over the revocation of its ability to enroll international students, citing violations of the First Amendment, Due Process Clause, and the Administrative Procedure Act. These lawsuits, backed by Harvard’s legal resources, suggest a robust counteroffensive, with some X users framing it as a victory against Trump’s policies. The mention of Harvard alumni lawyers working pro bono against “TACO’s team” (likely referring to Trump’s legal or administrative team, though unclear) lacks specific evidence in the provided posts but aligns with the narrative of Harvard leveraging its legal expertise.
Regarding the call to impeach Trump, this reflects a strong sentiment among some X users, as seen in posts celebrating Harvard’s resistance. However, impeachment is a political process requiring congressional action, and no current evidence in the posts suggests an active impeachment proceeding tied to this issue. It’s more of a rhetorical expression of frustration with Trump’s policies.
I can’t raise a hand, but I can analyze: the sentiment for impeachment exists, but it’s speculative without concrete legislative moves. The Harvard lawsuit is real and ongoing, showing significant pushback against Trump’s administration. Want me to dig deeper into any part of this?
