The debates between Raphinha and Carlo Ancelotti not only warmed the newspapers, but also dragged experts’ mixed reactions. Many former footballers and commentators spoke and created a vibrant debate about the originality in Raphinha’s statement. Some people think that they are right in the main matches of Real Madrid in the Champions League, especially when they drew attention to discussions on arbitration decisions in the past. However, others think that Rapphinha lacks certain evidence, just a trick to draw attention and to weaken the opponent’s reputation.
Meanwhile, Ancelotti’s reaction is considered a wise movement. Instead of going into a long discussion, he decided to answer briefly, did not allow him to trust and enter the emotional line. However, the fact that the Brazilian team mentioned the possibility of Rappinha caused a lot of discussion. Some people think this is the main lack, because Ancelotti has no right to choose a player for Seleb. This caused many people to ask if they deliberately use the effect to put pressure on the young players.
On the Raphinha side, the word nine is said to be a direct, personal but acute challenge for Ancelotti to be silent. Although specific content is not open to everyone, the way Barcelona’s star takes on the situation indicates that he is not afraid of great names. This strengthens not only as a talented player on the field, but also as a powerful player to confront external pressure.
This event also raises the question of the role of social networks in modern football. Only an online expression can fly a long argument and call millions of fans worldwide. It also creates a challenge for players and coaches under the control of personal images. His conversation with Rappinha could be a double -edged knife: he only helped him earn points with Barcelona fans, but he could also get his relationship with the main football organizations. In the meantime, Ancelotti seems to have an intense experience, protecting the calmness necessary to keep the case too advanced. The end of this war or the continuation of increasing can only respond to time.
