A jaw-dropping controversy is electrifying the nation this Tuesday, June 10, 2025, at 11:25 AM +07: Do you support Tulsi Gabbard’s call for the immediate arrest of James Comey? The explosive poll sweeping social media has ignited a wildfire of debate, with X threads erupting in fury, wild speculation, and passionate defenses that have the country on the brink. As Director of National Intelligence, Gabbard has stunned the political world by demanding the former FBI chief be locked up over a cryptic Instagram post, accusing him of inciting violence against President Donald Trump. With the public fiercely divided and the stakes sky-high, this could be a bold strike for justice—or a reckless power grab that shakes Washington to its core. Click now to dive into this bombshell that’s got everyone talking!

The storm broke when Gabbard, a Trump ally, took to Fox News to demand Comey’s arrest, pointing to his April Instagram post showing seashells arranged as “86 47.” Interpreted by some as a coded call to “get rid of” Trump—the 47th president—the post sparked outrage among conservatives. Gabbard labeled it a “direct threat,” arguing Comey, with his mob-prosecutor background, knew the implications. “This is a guy who spent his career locking up gangsters—he can’t plead ignorance!” she declared, calling for his immediate incarceration. One shocking X claim screams, “Comey’s post was a hit order on Trump—arrest him now!”—a statement racking up thousands of retweets, though hard evidence remains thin. The lack of clarity only fuels the frenzy, turning X into a battleground of raw emotion.
The roots trace back to Comey’s deleted post, captioned “Cool shell formation on my beach walk,” which he later said was a political jab, not a violent threat. But Gabbard and Trump supporters see a darker intent, tying it to two 2024 assassination attempts on Trump. They argue Comey’s influence as a former FBI director amplifies the danger, with Gabbard citing a Rutgers study suggesting 55% of left-leaning respondents found Trump’s assassination “somewhat justified.” Critics counter that the study’s context is misrepresented, and Comey’s defense—that he didn’t know “86” could mean “kill”—holds weight. Legal experts are split, with some calling it protected speech, others hinting at a potential investigation by the Secret Service, already probing the matter.
Supporters hail Gabbard’s move as a stand against elite corruption. They point to Comey’s history—fired by Trump in 2017 over Russia probe tensions—as proof of bias, with X users chanting, “Lock him up for betraying America!” The timing, amid Trump’s second term, suggests a purge of perceived enemies, aligning with his “truth and sanity” heritage push. His alliance with Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) hints at a broader agenda, possibly using tech to scrutinize past officials. Proponents demand swift justice, with #ArrestComey trending alongside #TulsiStandsTall, reflecting a surge of patriotic fervor.
Opponents are furious. Democrats and historians argue Gabbard’s call threatens free speech and academic freedom, noting Comey’s post lacked explicit violence. “This is a witch hunt—Gabbard’s playing politics!” one X user raged, gaining traction. Legal analysts suggest no crime fits, with First Amendment protections likely shielding Comey unless intent is proven— a high bar unmet so far. Some see it as retaliation for Comey’s Trump criticism, with posts mocking, “Gabbard’s just Trump’s puppet!” The Secret Service’s silence adds fuel, leaving room for conspiracy theories about a staged controversy.
The public is torn. Informal X polls show 53% back Gabbard’s demand, 47% oppose, based on thousands of responses. Supporters argue it’s a necessary reckoning, citing Trump’s survival as evidence of ongoing threats. Detractors warn of authoritarian overreach, fearing a precedent for silencing dissent. A viral post claims, “Comey’s arrest could expose a D.C. deep state plot!”—a bold hook driving clicks, though unverified. The poll’s visibility has sparked calls for congressional action, with #JusticeForTrump trending against #FreeComey, mirroring a nation at a crossroads.
Social media is a powder keg. Memes cast Gabbard as a justice warrior or a tyrant, while Comey’s defenders share his apology clips. Users dig into his FBI tenure and Gabbard’s motives, though findings are inconclusive. A particularly explosive post alleges, “Comey was paid to target Trump—Gabbard’s the hero!”—a claim boosting engagement, despite no proof. The debate’s intensity has drawn millions, awaiting the next move.
At 11:25 AM +07 today, tension mounts. With Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security’s Kristi Noem in Trump’s corner, some predict a rapid arrest—though legal hurdles loom. Others foresee public backlash forcing a retreat, with protests brewing. Gabbard stands firm, while Comey’s team stays silent. The stakes are enormous—could this be the uprising Gabbard envisions, or a firestorm that backfires? The answer could redefine justice—click to explore the drama that’s got the nation on edge!