In a heated House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on May 21, 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio unleashed a fiery declaration—“I RUN THIS, NOT YOU!”—at Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), silencing the room and exposing a simmering power struggle that threatens to fracture the House. The clash, centered on the Trump administration’s aggressive student visa revocation policy, was more than a momentary flare-up; it revealed deep ideological rifts and personal tensions that could reshape congressional dynamics and influence U.S. immigration policy for years to come.

The confrontation erupted when Jayapal grilled Rubio over the detention and attempted deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian Columbia University student, and Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish PhD student at Tufts, whose visa was revoked after co-authoring an op-ed critical of Israel. Jayapal, Ranking Member of the Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement Subcommittee, accused Rubio of trampling constitutional free speech protections, citing an obscure Immigration and Nationality Act provision that allows the Secretary of State to deport non-citizens for activities deemed to have “adverse foreign policy consequences.” “Where in the Constitution does it say you can override the First Amendment?” Jayapal demanded, her voice rising with indignation.

Rubio, unyielding, doubled down. “There is no constitutional right to a student visa,” he retorted, emphasizing that such visas are a privilege, not a right. His explosive outburst came as Jayapal pressed him on Ozturk’s case, alleging the revocation stemmed solely from her op-ed. “I RUN THIS, NOT YOU!” Rubio roared, a stark assertion of his authority as Secretary of State. The room fell silent, with Jayapal momentarily stunned, her usual eloquence replaced by a pause that underscored the intensity of the moment. The exchange, captured on video, went viral, fueling polarized reactions across social media.

The clash wasn’t just about policy; it exposed a deeper power struggle. Rubio, a former senator now wielding significant influence in Trump’s administration, has embraced a hardline stance on immigration, aligning with the president’s mass deportation agenda. His revocation of thousands of student visas, particularly targeting those supporting pro-Palestinian causes, has drawn bipartisan criticism. A bipartisan letter from Congresswoman Deborah Ross and others, including Jayapal, urged Rubio to restore visa processing for Indian students, warning of economic and diplomatic fallout. Yet Rubio’s defiance signals a broader shift, prioritizing national security over diplomatic niceties.

Jayapal, a leading progressive voice, has positioned herself as a defender of immigrant rights, leading over 100 lawmakers in demanding answers on Khalil’s detention. Her insistence that Rubio’s actions undermine free speech resonates with Democrats but has drawn scorn from conservatives, who praise Rubio’s tough stance. Posts on X celebrated Rubio’s resolve, with one user calling him a champion of “America First” policies, while others accused Jayapal of supporting “radicals abusing guest access.” The divide reflects a House teetering on the edge of dysfunction, with immigration policy a flashpoint.

This confrontation could have lasting consequences. Rubio’s assertion of executive power challenges congressional oversight, raising questions about the balance of authority in Trump’s second term. Jayapal’s stunned silence may galvanize progressives to push back harder, potentially stalling GOP initiatives. The House, already fractured by partisan gridlock, risks further paralysis as both sides dig in. For Rubio, the outburst cements his transformation into a combative figure, while Jayapal’s resolve could rally her base. As the 2025 session unfolds, this clash may prove a tipping point, exposing fault lines that could redefine the House’s power dynamics and shape the nation’s immigration debate.