Hillary Clinton was once a ‘president in the dark’? The leaked email series revealed her true role under Obama
Washington D.C.– A series of newly leaked internal emails is causing the US public opinion to stir when the question is that Hillary Clinton – former US Secretary of State – Does it really play the role of “president in the dark” in the Barack Obama government?
The documents are believed to belong to the White House Senior Strategic Advisor in the period 2009–2012, including email exchanges between Hillary Clinton and many key characters such as Susan Rice, John Brennan, and President Obama. Notably, some email shows that Mrs. Clinton not only performs the diplomatic role but alsoDirectly intervene in internal management decisions, from the Middle East policy to national security reform.
A leaked document:“According to HRC, the intelligence group will focus on Yemen first. No need to wait for feedback from Potus.”– In it, “HRC” is understood as Hillary Rodham Clinton and “Potus” is President of the United States. This note line raises a big question:Does Clinton really make a decision that should only be under the authority of the president?
Political experts quickly divided into two streams of views. Some argue that Clinton – with extensive experience and deep personal relationship –Actual “powerful architect”, while Obama is an iconic and inspiring person. On the contrary, the supporters of the former president countered violently, saying that these were just thoseStrategic exchange among the cabinet members, do not reflect the actual power structure.
The White House has not made an official comment. Meanwhile, the communication team of Mrs. Clinton refused to confirm the authenticity of emails, and called it “trying to misrepresent” from opposing political forces.
Although the truth is still left open, the incident once again rejected the debate for the true influence of Hillary Clinton in the Obama government – and whether she had held.Power exceeds the official role limit.
In a suspicious American politics, the “presidents in the dark” may be what few people want to believe – but no one dares to ignore it.