CIA Insider Slams Obama’s Alleged Plot to Sabotage Trump in Explosive Tell-All!
In a bombshell revelation that’s setting social media ablaze, a former CIA official has stepped forward to vehemently deny claims that former President Barack Obama orchestrated a sinister plot to undermine Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. The accusations, fueled by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and amplified by President Trump himself, allege that Obama and his inner circle manipulated intelligence to fabricate a narrative of Russian interference in the 2016 election, branding it a “treasonous conspiracy.” But this high-ranking ex-CIA figure is calling it all a lie—and the fallout is nothing short of explosive.
The controversy erupted when Gabbard released a series of declassified documents, claiming they expose Obama’s administration, including top officials like former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, as masterminds behind a calculated effort to discredit Trump’s 2016 win. Gabbard’s report, dripping with terms like “coup” and “treason,” points to the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that concluded Russia sought to influence the election in Trump’s favor. She alleges the ICA was based on flimsy evidence, including the discredited Steele dossier, and was rushed under Obama’s direct orders to tarnish Trump’s legitimacy. Trump seized on these claims, posting an AI-generated video on Truth Social depicting Obama’s arrest and declaring it “THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY!”
But the former CIA official, who served under multiple administrations and spoke on condition of anonymity, isn’t buying it. “These allegations are pure fiction, a political stunt dressed up as truth,” they said. “The idea that Obama personally directed a conspiracy to fabricate intelligence is absurd. The 2017 ICA was built on solid evidence from multiple agencies, showing Russia’s efforts to sow discord and boost Trump’s campaign through cyberattacks and social media manipulation.” The official pointed to extensive investigations, including a 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report backed by Republican senators like Marco Rubio, which confirmed Russia’s interference and found no evidence of politicization. “This is a desperate attempt to rewrite history,” they added, calling Gabbard’s claims “thin gruel” that contradicts over 2,500 pages of prior reports.
Gabbard’s memo cites a December 2016 National Security Council meeting where Obama allegedly ordered the ICA, claiming it relied on “substandard” sources like the Steele dossier. The former CIA official counters that the dossier was a minor annex, included at the FBI’s insistence, not Obama’s, and had no bearing on the ICA’s core findings. “The dossier was controversial, sure, but it was never the backbone of the assessment. The real evidence came from signals intelligence, cyber forensics, and human sources showing Russia’s intent,” they explained. Former Obama aides, including Brennan, have echoed this, dismissing Gabbard’s accusations as baseless and politically motivated.
The timing of these claims raises eyebrows. Critics, including Democratic Rep. Jim Himes, suggest they’re a diversion from Trump’s struggles with the Jeffrey Epstein case, where his administration faces pressure to release sensitive files. “It’s a day that ends in ‘y,’ and Trump’s team is scrambling to change the subject,” Himes quipped. Obama’s office, in a rare statement, called the allegations “ridiculous” and a “weak attempt at distraction.” Yet, Trump and his allies are doubling down, with Gabbard referring documents to the Justice Department for a criminal probe and the DOJ forming a “strike force” to investigate.
On social media, the story is a wildfire. Threads and X are buzzing with hashtags like #ObamaGate and #TrumpVindicated, alongside memes of Obama in handcuffs and fiery debates over whether this is truth or propaganda. Supporters of Gabbard argue it’s proof of a “Deep State” plot, while detractors call it dangerous misinformation, pointing to the AI-generated video as a low blow. “This is how you manipulate reality,” warned one user, while another countered, “Finally, the truth is out—Obama’s been exposed!” The viral video, complete with a Pepe the Frog meme, has drawn accusations of racism, with some comparing it to historical anti-Black imagery.
The former CIA official warned of the broader implications: “This kind of rhetoric erodes trust in institutions. If people believe a former president faked intelligence, what’s next? It’s a slippery slope to chaos.” They urged the public to look at the evidence—decades of intelligence work, bipartisan reports, and even Putin’s own 2018 admission that he favored Trump. Yet, with Trump’s team pushing the narrative and Gabbard’s criminal referrals gaining traction, the story shows no signs of fading. Will this be the scandal that reshapes political discourse, or just another fleeting controversy? One thing’s certain: the truth is under fire, and everyone’s picking a side.
