Conservative commentator Candace Owens has reignited tensions in the world of political and cultural commentary with a sharp jab at actress and talk-show host Whoopi Goldberg. In a fiery statement that quickly gained traction online, Owens referred to Goldberg as “the expert of being stupid on TV,” sparking another chapter in their ongoing ideological feud.
Owens’ remarks came during a segment of her podcast, where she criticized Goldberg’s views on recent political and social issues. While the exact trigger for this insult remains unclear, Owens made it evident that she took issue with Goldberg’s commentary on current events, accusing her of “spreading misinformation” and “pandering to a biased audience.”
Whoopi Goldberg, a co-host on *The View*, is no stranger to controversy herself. Known for her blunt opinions on politics, culture, and entertainment, Goldberg often clashes with conservative figures. Her unapologetic stances have made her a polarizing figure, adored by fans and criticized by detractors like Owens.
The feud between Owens and Goldberg has divided public opinion. Supporters of Owens praised her for calling out what they perceive as hypocrisy from Hollywood elites. “Candace is right; Whoopi gets away with saying ridiculous things on TV,” one Twitter user commented.
On the other hand, Goldberg’s fans rallied behind her, dismissing Owens’ comments as inflammatory rhetoric. “Whoopi has decades of experience and speaks her mind. Candace should look in the mirror before throwing insults,” a Facebook user remarked.
The spat between Owens and Goldberg underscores the broader cultural divide dominating American discourse. With both figures representing vastly different ideological camps, their public disagreements often reflect the nation’s polarized landscape.
Owens’ insult may not be the last word in their ongoing feud, but it adds another layer to the ever-growing tensions between conservative commentators and liberal celebrities. Whether Goldberg will respond remains to be seen, but this clash has certainly kept audiences talking.
For now, it’s clear that the divide between their perspectives isn’t just political—it’s personal.
