Representative Jasmine Crockett, a Democrat from Texas, made headlines during her appearance onThe Late Show with Stephen Colberton May 12, 2025, with sharp criticism of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and its co-leader, Elon Musk. Crockett labeled DOGE a “cover-up” and a “scam,” asserting, “It was a complete sham. This was never about government efficiency.” Her remarks, delivered with characteristic fervor, reflect growing skepticism among some lawmakers about the initiative’s true intentions and its impact on federal operations.
DOGE, spearheaded by Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, was established to streamline government processes and reduce wasteful spending. Promoted as a bold reform to enhance efficiency, it has drawn both praise and controversy. Supporters argue it exposes bureaucratic inefficiencies, with Musk claiming it has identified billions in potential savings. Critics like Crockett, however, view it as a pretext for dismantling essential programs. OnColbert, she suggested DOGE’s agenda prioritizes private interests over public welfare, pointing to Musk’s business ties as a potential conflict.
Crockett’s critique aligns with sentiments expressed by other Democrats who argue DOGE lacks transparency and accountability. She emphasized that the initiative’s proposals, such as the widely discussed “DOGE dividend” of $5,000 for citizens, are impractical and misleading. “I don’t know what an extra $5,000 is going to do for you,” she previously stated, dismissing the idea as a political stunt. HerColbertappearance amplified these concerns, framing DOGE as a distraction from addressing systemic issues like funding for social services.
The backlash against DOGE isn’t limited to Democrats. Some Republicans have questioned its feasibility, citing the complexity of overhauling federal agencies. Posts on X reveal polarized reactions, with some users calling Crockett’s remarks “unhinged” and defending DOGE’s mission, while others echo her view that it serves Musk’s personal agenda. A November 2024 post quoted Crockett arguing DOGE itself wastes taxpayer money by creating redundant bureaucracy, a point she reiterated onColbert.
Musk, a polarizing figure, has faced scrutiny for his role in DOGE, especially given his leadership of Tesla and SpaceX. Crockett has previously accused him of “nefarious” actions without evidence, a claim fact-checked as false by outlets like PolitiFact regarding alleged Tesla payments. HerColbertcomments avoided such specifics but maintained a critical tone, suggesting DOGE’s reforms could undermine programs vital to vulnerable communities.
The debate over DOGE reflects broader tensions about government reform in 2025. While its advocates promise a leaner, more effective system, detractors warn of unintended consequences, like weakened public services. Crockett’s outspoken stance, amplified by herColbertplatform, underscores the challenge of balancing efficiency with equity. As DOGE’s proposals await congressional review, her remarks ensure the initiative remains a lightning rod for debate. Whether her accusations gain traction or fade as rhetoric will depend on DOGE’s tangible outcomes and public response in the coming months.
