MSNBC’s highly publicized launch of Jen Psaki’s new show has taken a troubling turn as early ratings reveal a significant shortfall in viewer interest. The former White House Press Secretary under President Joe Biden was expected to bring a strong following to her weekly political commentary program, but the numbers tell a different story—one that paints a sobering picture for both Psaki and MSNBC.

The debut of “Inside with Jen Psaki” drew widespread media attention and was touted by the network as a fresh, analytical voice in political discourse. With Psaki’s sharp communication skills and deep experience in the political arena, MSNBC aimed to capitalize on her credibility and presence. However, the show’s performance has fallen flat, with viewership significantly lower than that of its predecessor in the same time slot. According to Nielsen data, the show failed to crack the top ranks in cable news programming, a stark contrast to the expectations set prior to its premiere.

While exact figures vary depending on time slot comparisons, one consistent trend has emerged: the audience is not tuning in as expected. In its critical launch window, Psaki’s show trailed behind both Fox News and CNN in key demographics, particularly among adults aged 25 to 54—a segment vital to advertisers and long-term viability. Compounding the issue, social media chatter surrounding the show has been mixed at best, with critics pointing to a lack of dynamism and a predictable partisan slant that fails to engage viewers looking for more diverse perspectives.

Some media analysts suggest the ratings disaster may be due in part to overexposure. Psaki, who became a household name during her tenure in the Biden administration, had already been a frequent guest on MSNBC prior to getting her own show. As such, audiences may feel they’ve already heard what she has to say, diminishing the appeal of a full-length program centered on her views. Others argue that MSNBC’s programming strategy, focused heavily on familiar liberal voices, may be reaching a saturation point. Without fresh formats or genuinely new angles, even recognizable figures like Psaki can struggle to maintain audience interest.
Furthermore, there are signs that viewers are growing weary of the traditional cable news approach, which relies heavily on monologues, panel discussions, and predictable partisan takes. In an age where podcasts, independent YouTube commentary, and short-form content on platforms like TikTok and Instagram are increasingly popular, traditional shows face the challenge of evolving or losing relevance. Psaki’s show, so far, appears to have offered more of the same—something many viewers are actively tuning out.
It’s also worth noting that the show’s timing could not be more precarious. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, political commentary is in high demand, yet audiences are becoming more discerning and selective. In this environment, simply having a recognizable host is no longer enough to guarantee success. Audiences want insight, originality, and engagement—not rehashed talking points or carefully curated narratives that echo the mainstream party line.
MSNBC has not yet responded publicly to the ratings drop, but internal discussions are reportedly underway to reevaluate both the content and format of Psaki’s show. Whether this leads to a strategic overhaul or eventual cancellation remains to be seen, but the early warning signs are difficult to ignore. For Jen Psaki, who entered the media landscape with considerable fanfare and political cachet, the failure of her show to connect with audiences represents a significant setback.
In a hyper-competitive media environment, no one is immune from the pressures of performance—not even a seasoned communicator like Psaki. If MSNBC hopes to reverse the downward trend, it may need to rethink its approach, not only to her show, but to its broader programming strategy. Viewers are clearly signaling that it’s no longer enough to offer familiar faces; content must also be compelling, fresh, and in tune with an evolving media landscape.